
Many writers switch things up to a degree during their careers, but some do pretty radical makeovers.
One is J.K. Rowling, who became internationally famous with her fabulous seven-book Harry Potter series. But rather than remain completely Potter-focused, the English author pivoted to penning the non-magical novel The Casual Vacancy before moving to crime fiction starting in 2013 under the pen name Robert Galbraith. I’m currently reading 2022’s sixth book in that series starring private investigators Cormoran Strike and Robin Ellacott, and The Ink Black Heart (with its online harassment theme and other major digital elements) is so far as good as its five predecessors. Which I’m grateful for, because the novel is more than 1,000 pages. 😵
(I also mentioned Rowling’s avoidance of being pigeon-holed in a 2021 post that has some similarities to this piece but contains mostly different content.)
Sometimes, a radical makeover involves a writing-format switch. For instance, Scotland’s Sir Walter Scott was a renowned poet during the first part of his career before becoming a prolific novelist (Ivanhoe, Rob Roy, etc.). Roughly 150 years later, Canada’s Margaret Atwood made her own highly successful transition from poetry to novels (The Handmaid’s Tale, Cat’s Eye, etc.).
Flipping that script was Thomas Hardy, a renowned novelist during the first half of his career (Far from the Madding Crowd, Tess of the d’Urbervilles, etc.) before concentrating on poetry. Heck, the English author lived and wrote for 33 years after the 1895 publication of his final novel: Jude the Obscure.
Nathaniel Hawthorne came out with an amateurish first novel — Fanshawe (1828) — when he was not yet 25, but then focused on short stories over the next two decades. Some of the tales were gems, and Hawthorne enjoyed a modicum of success, but it was the American author’s return to novel-writing with 1850’s The Scarlet Letter that earned him wide fame during his lifetime and beyond.
India’s Arundhati Roy made a stunning novelistic debut in 1997 with The God of Small Things, only to turn to political nonfiction and activism for two decades before finally producing a second novel.
Any writers you’d like to mention who did the major makeover thing?
Speaking of changes, here’s Phil Ochs singing…”Changes”:
And speaking of major makeovers, I was a football fan when I was much younger, but now hate the sport for its health-shattering violence, greedy right-wing billionaire owners, racism, sexism, homophobia, and pseudo-patriotic trappings. So, I’m not watching today’s Stupor…um…Super Bowl. 🙂
My literary-trivia book is described and can be purchased here: Fascinating Facts About Famous Fiction Authors and the Greatest Novels of All Time.
In addition to this weekly blog, I write the 2003-started/award-winning “Montclairvoyant” topical-humor column for Baristanet.com every Thursday. The latest piece — about my local council FINALLY voting to initiate the firing of the municipality’s women-harassing township manager — is here.
Nice thought
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, hamadalikhan776!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love her adult books. Never read Harry Potter. I’m not interested in her political, personal life or religious beliefs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Paula! I agree — J.K. Rowling’s adult books are excellent. I also loved her “Harry Potter” series. As for authors’ beliefs, I, like you, usually separate them from their work — with some exceptions. 🙂 Rowling certainly doesn’t use her great fiction for personal polemics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Dead & Buried.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for the reblog, Lena! 🙂
LikeLike
Elizabeth Bowen, who most know for her short stories today, turned her talent to the topic of her fellow writers, penning a charming and slender volume (48 pages) published in 1942 titled “English Novelists”, for the series Britain in Pictures. The series offered short works on British birds, wildlife, statesmen, clubs, drawings, etc., etc., etc.
The back cover shows many dozen offerings— among them, Graham Greene contributed “British Dramatists” for the series. George Orwell wrote “The British People”*, Edith Sitwell “English Women”, Cecil Beaton “British Photographers”, David Low “British Cartoonists”.
All of these luminaries were probably more comfortable doing what they did best, but they all made something for Britain In Pictures. I suspect the impetus for the series is to boost morale and national wartime pride.
I own the Bowen book, #23 in the series.
* the asterisk was attached to the Orwell, as ‘not yet published’, but it was– under the title “The English People, #100.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, jhNY! Sounds like a really unique work (Elizabeth Bowen’s) and series by writers doing change-of-pace stuff.
LikeLike
Very interesting subject. I guess one should never say never because you never know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, vanaltman! You are right about that. 🙂 (Your well-said second line.)
LikeLike
PG Wodehouse, after college, wrote school sports stories before beginning his career in fiction– but he also, in the early 20th century, wrote lyrics and dialogue for musical theater– among his collaborators was the famous American songwriter Gerome Kern.
from wikipedia:
Broadway: 1915–1919
“A third milestone in Wodehouse’s life came towards the end of 1915: his old songwriting partner Jerome Kern introduced him to the writer Guy Bolton, who became Wodehouse’s closest friend and a regular collaborator. Bolton and Kern had a musical, Very Good Eddie, running at the Princess Theatre in New York. The show was successful, but they thought the song lyrics weak and invited Wodehouse to join them on its successor. This was Miss Springtime (1916), which ran for 227 performances—a good run by the standards of the day. The team produced several more successes, including Leave It to Jane (1917), Oh, Boy! (1917–18) and Oh, Lady! Lady!! (1918), and Wodehouse and Bolton wrote a few more shows with other composers. In these musicals Wodehouse’s lyrics won high praise from critics as well as fellow lyricists such as Ira Gershwin.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, jhNY! I didn’t realize P.G. Wodehouse’s career was quite that diverse! I certainly have greatly enjoyed his Jeeves/Bertie Wooster stories and novels.
LikeLike
Here’s a bit of transcendent song which shares title with this week’s blog, Same Cooke’s “A Change Is Gonna Come”. Enjoy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, jhNY! I was definitely thinking of that superb song when writing this post’s title. 🙂
LikeLike
I confess to finding it on youtube, but not listening, this time. All the other times, it made my eyes water.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I totally hear you, jhNY.
LikeLike
Ironic isn’t it? I hate the sport for its “woke” political activism. I used to like football when they focused on playing the game. This year’s Superbowl, despite its divisive and separatist “black national anthem”, was actually a good game.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for the comment, memongo1. I guess the NFL has a small amount of so-called “woke” elements — at least partly because of some pressure from some players. But I still think that, overall, the league ownership is pretty darn conservative. One example being that no team has signed Colin Kaepernick since he kneeled to draw attention to racism, police brutality, etc., even though he’d be better than a number of backup QBs.
LikeLike
“Divisive and separatist”– a bit over-the-top and perjorative.
Was “a good game”– with this I can agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post, Dave and you certainly sparked an interesting discussion. Thanks again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much, Max! I’ve really been enjoying the discussion, too. 🙂
LikeLike
Again I’m with the oldies…. what about Rudyard Kipling? He had a career as an assistant editor for a gazette, then wrote poems and short stories, before he began penning juvenile stories and novels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Resa! I didn’t realize Rudyard Kipling had so varied a career with the written word!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, he was an interesting person. He was the only one I could think of. 🤔
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
HI Dave, another interesting topic. My first thoughts were of the Bronte sisters who initially published poetry and then published their various novels. The person I really want to mention here though, is Geoffrey Chaucer. He wrote a lot of amazing poetry – I am sharing about his poem Parliament of Fowls for my Dark Origins post this month as it was the first poem to link love with Valentine – and he wrote his stories. I am a big Chaucer fan although I have to read a more recent translation, my middle English not being up to scratch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Robbie! Great mention of the Brontes first writing poetry — very good poetry, too, from what I’ve read.
And Chaucer is indeed amazing to read! I’ve also read his work mostly in modern English (as I’ve read Shakespeare’s work), and have no regrets. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you also enjoy. Chaucer, I find his stories hilarious. I always remember when my son, Greg, The Taming of the Shrew as a children’s version and he laughed and laughed. That’s how I feel about Canterbury Tales.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, Robbie! Chaucer can be very, VERY funny.
LikeLike
Thank you for this very interesting article!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Lena, and thank you for commenting! 🙂
LikeLike
Great post, Dave and you certainly sparked an interesting discussion. Thanks again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the kind words, Dan! I agree about the interesting discussion. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Russian author Anton Chekhov alternated between writing short stories and plays during his relatively short life. He was actually trained as a physician.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Anonymous! That’s a really good mention! Interesting when people are adept in a using-both-sides-of-the-brain sort of way, as in Chekhov being both a writer and physician. Khaled Hosseini (“The Kite Runner,” etc.) also had that double skill set.
LikeLike
Lewis Carroll, the pen name of Charles Dodgson, was best known for writing the Alice books, but he also wrote works on mathematics under his real name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave, please change to “…he also wrote works on mathematics under his real name.” Thank you very much.
LikeLike
Changed.
Writing expertise and math expertise — another combination one doesn’t always see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am not an expert, but I am a retired math teacher who writes. I write prose the way I wrote math lessons. Logically.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very nice combination of skills, vanaltman! And I can see how each skill could influence the other.
LikeLike
Thomas Hardy is an interesting example, I agree. I think I read that he always wanted to be a poet and known for his poetry, and wrote his books mainly to make money. I am very glad anyway that he did what he enjoyed the most for the remainder of his years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Diana! What you read sounds plausible. By the time Thomas Hardy became a writer, novels were a more prominent literary form than poetry, so perhaps he did at first go with where more of the money was while still not ultimately abandoning his true literary love (poetry). All in all, an unusual career arc!
LikeLike
I’m thinking of poet turned author particularly re: my favorite one and/or Leonard Cohen. Read Beautiful Losers, but I liked his poetry esp. Spice Box of Earth, and his music much more. During that time period, I was also reading Richard Brautigans poety, became delighted with his book Trout Stream Fishing in America. And Terry Southern, Langston Hughes poets/novelists, etc. Robert Pirsig teacher, philosopher, journalist and writer: Zen And The Art of…, Reynolds Price Biblical scholar, poet, wrote the song Copperline along with James Taylor. *sigh* Nice theme Dave. Always liked to play sports more than watch sports. Susi
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Susi! I appreciate the various mentions of multi-talented people involved in writing books, music, and more! And I agree that it’s a lot more fun (and healthier) to play sports than to watch sports. Although watching kids play sports — minus the money, minus the intense level of violence, and all that other baggage when pros play — can be fun. 🙂
LikeLike
Yes, watching kids play sports is great fun. Have 3 grandsons, one is into wrestling and the other LaCrosse and the third, who is a guitarist, plays heavy metal. Name of his band is the Skincrawlers, ha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very talented grandsons you have, Susi! 🙂 Athletes and a musician!
My teen daughter is an excellent athlete who has most recently been on her high school’s gymnastics and softball teams, and I really enjoy watching her and her teammates compete/play. (Unfortunately, she tore her ACL doing gymnastics last fall, had knee-reconstruction surgery, and probably can’t resume sports until September or so. 😦 )
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so sorry to hear that Dave. My daughter wanted to enroll my granddaughter, who is only 6, in gymnastics and I told her absolutely no. When very young children get injuries to bones, it can affect the growth plate. Your daughter, being a teen, will bounce back but tendon and/or bone injuries are tough at any age. Hope she recovers quickly, and takes it slow until she is back to full speed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Susi! She is definitely not happy about this injury — and the three two-hour sessions of physical therapy each week since the surgery. But what can you do?
Very wise advice/decision by you re gymnastics for your grandchild. My wife and I also would rather our daughter have replaced gymnastics with another sport, but it’s something we’ve not been able to convince her of for years. 😦 Maybe this time, after she recovers… Track feels like a good fall/winter substitute. 🙂
LikeLike
What is the actual quality of Cohen’s book, though? I can never distil it through the reviews. It says its main obsession/theme is sex. I wonder if this is also to blame for some of the negative reviews. But, regardless, there is no denying he had so much trouble writing and publishing his books, as from some accounts I read anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Diana, All I remember re: Cohen’s Beautiful Losers is jealousy as the main theme and someone falling down an elevator shaft (some images you can’t get out of your head); however, it was 60/70s with sex, drugs and rock and roll being the trifecta of most artistic endeavors in this time period. Seems now there is more fantasy and/or a residual component. Susi
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have in the meantime found out, Dave, that even Charles Dickens wrote non fiction novels and essays, such as A Childs History of England, All the Year Round and American Notes. I really think this is an interesting aspect which you brought up here and thank you very much:)
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re welcome, Martina, and thank you! Great mention! That part of Dickens’ output is certainly not as well known as his novels. He penned short stories, too, among other things. A very busy writer…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Martina, I didn’t know that. Thank you for teaching me something new about Dickens.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Henry James branched out similarly when he wrote “The American Scene” at the turn of the 20th century, which I tried valiantly to read. This was a sort of impressionistic travelogue, though so outlandishly constructed by the sentence as to become more tedious than entertaining for me. A half-page of a sentence which once dissected and digested had more length, clause after clause after qualifying clause, than sense or insight– and then came the next one.
And I’m a guy who read John Ruskin voluntarily for an entire semester of concentrated study– so the sentence length was no great discouragement. The difference: I found Ruskin uniformly comprehensible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The latter part of Henry James’ career was definitely a time of some dense, run-on-sentence overwriting, whether in his fiction or nonfiction. I’ve read “The Ambassadors” (1903) from that approximate time and while the novel had a number of good moments it was also often quite a slog.
LikeLike
See also “Wings of a Dove”, which I found to be a hard slog to read, only to find myself, many pages in, put off by the plot’s many unlikely, even farcical coincidences. Another late James I didn’t finish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, right about that time — 1902.
“The Portrait of a Lady,” two decades earlier (1881), remains my favorite Henry James novel.
LikeLike
What interesting information!👍Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not only do I find the topics you choose to write about quite compelling I find the comments your topics generate just as compelling to read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for the kind words, Daniel! 🙂 I also greatly look forward to the comments, and I appreciate yours!
LikeLiked by 1 person
HI Danny, lovely to see you here. I also like the commentary and have to set aside about an hour for Dave’s posts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you very much, Robbie, for devoting some of your ultra-busy schedule to time here! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
I enjoy your posts and the comments people make here 💚
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Robbie! Much appreciated. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Another fun theme, Dave. It’s interesting how some authors write in more than one genre most of their careers. Camus comes to mind: journalism, essays, short stories and plays. I find his fiction too journalistic, so I wonder if that’s a handicap/asset when style bleeds into other genre. Also authors like Louise Erdrich write poetry and fiction, and her fiction is very poetic. Something to ponder…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you, Mary Jo! Yes, some authors are impressively diverse when it comes to genres and formats. And that’s a GREAT point that there can be some negatives (in addition to the positives) to that if a writer’s style “bleeds into another genre.” Well put! Another example of that is novelists who allegedly include some fiction in their nonfiction — as John Steinbeck was accused of doing in “Travels with Charley.” (Don’t know if that was true or not.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Mary Jo, it seems a lot of writers cross genres with their writing. There are many that write for children and adults or write poetry and prose. Some even do their own illustrations and cover design. I suppose many artistic people have talent in more than one area of creativity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent point, Robbie! Writing for children as well as adults and illustrating are great examples of crossing genres.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Another thought provoking topic! Thank you! My first thoughts turned to Sylvia Plath who was much celebrated for her poetry although wrote the fabulous The Bell Jar although it’s difficult to ascertain if there was a transition as such as I think much of it was published posthumously.
I think we touched on the transition of celebrities muscling in on literary fame quite recently. Obviously far too many to mention here and they don’t necessarily fit in with the theme🙄
Tarantino moved from movies to publishing his novel last year which I absolutely loved. Again maybe not quite a good fit for this week.
Some of the WWI poets such as Sassoon and Graves wrote excellent novels after seeing poetry success. So I might have to leave it there this week. Although I shall enjoy reading the comments!!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you, Sarah! Those are several great examples of people with multiple talents. “The Bell Jar” is quite a memorable work.
Yes, many a celebrity has tried their hand at a book — in some cases, a children’s book. When it comes to adult fiction, perhaps some of those celebs use ghost writers.
I guess there have been some entertainers who became truly good novelists — Fannie Flagg and Thomas Tryon are two who come to mind.
I’m enjoying the comments, too! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Plath is one I thought of. I wondered had she lived whether she would have written more semi-autobiographies, or novels, or continued with poetry. Very much an unwritten page.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great observations, Shehanne. One does wonder what writers who died young would have done with a few more decades of life. 😦
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😦
LikeLike
Her daughter Frieda wrote a poem in response to a TV series or film that was made some years ago called ‘My Mother’. It’s quite powerful. There is a sense of loss when an author dies quite young and the unrealised potential. F Scott Fitzgerald is another one – and coincidentally a possible name to put forward for this week’s theme. I think he went to Hollywood to become a screenwriter – although I suspect writing novels is where his talents really lay.
LikeLiked by 2 people
F. Scott Fitzgerald definitely did some Hollywood screenwriting, Sarah. Excellent mention! And he wrote many great short stories in addition to his novels.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I meant to add to this it was the anniversary of Plath’s death over the weekend. Not the cheeriest of anniversaries of course but very timely to remember her incredible poetry and writing.
Fannie Flagg I remember reading many many years ago – Fried Green Tomatoes at the…..something something cafe…I remember it being an excellent read and I recall her name came up before as I think you mentioned she was an actress before going into writing. Is that right? 🤔
And yes the celebrated (or not so celebrated) ghost writers. It’s quite a curious profession to be involved in I should think!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not a cheery anniversary indeed, Sarah. 😦
Yes, former actress Fannie Flagg wrote “Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe.” Her best novel, but I’ve read all but one of her other novels, and they’re mostly excellent, too.
And I agree about ghostwriting being a rather curious profession. Admirable and noble in its way to do that amount of work for little recognition. Hopefully they’re paid well when they write for celebrities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The writer who immediately comes to mind is Donald Hall, a NH poet laureate who became an essayist toward the end of this life because the poetry was gone. (I’m paraphrasing from his book Essays after Eighty.)
I have no use to football. The game makes no sense to me, and I don’t understand the national obession with it. Being slammed into so hard that your heart stops isn’t my idea of fun.
LikeLiked by 2 people
*for
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Liz! From poetry to essays is definitely a major transition, and it’s great that Donald Hall found another writing outlet when his poetry muse disappeared.
I completely agree with you about football. It does seem senseless, and it’s SO brutal. I guess it says something about “the American character” (or at least the preferences of many American men) that football is by far the most popular professional and college sport in the U.S. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Dave!
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Arthur Conan Doyle crowned his earlier authorial success of Sherlock Holmes with a most gullible interest and promotion of various hoaxes involving spiritualism, photographs of fairies and photographs of ghosts– the latter two transparently obvious double exposures. He also may have involved himself in the faux-archeological discovery of the Piltdown Man.
Before writing “King Solomon’s Mines” and “She”, H. Ryder Haggard, having spent years in southern Africa in various unofficial governmental positions, wrote a non-fiction treatise on South African politics, which sold, unsurprisingly, less well than the aforementioned novels.
Raymond Chandler was an oil executive and an aspiring poet first, before the deprivations of the Depression inspired him to hit the pulps and hard-boiled success.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you, jhNY, for those excellent examples of authors who shifted gears! Sometimes in unexpected ways. 🙂 So glad, among other things, that Raymond Chandler didn’t remain an oil executive. “Oil Well, My Lovely” just doesn’t sound right…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doyle’s interest in the faeries and spiritualism has always seemed so at odds with everything else about him however it’s another fascinating side to the author of one of the most celebrated literary detectives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Weird indeed, Sarah. People can definitely be complicated sometimes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your post brought me back decades to English Literature Class 101 and the question “do writers evolve over time.” My professor (an amazing teacher/mentor) suggested that William Shakespeare, at the beginning of his career, wrote in a style that was heavily influenced by the classical authors of the time. But by the end of his career, he had developed a style that was uniquely his own full of wit and humor, embedded with a deep understanding of human nature.
And here is where I digress, because you prompted a thought about writers who write both fiction and non-fiction. Think of the brilliant Mark Twain, who is best known for his novels, such as The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. But he was also a master of non-fiction when he wrote “Life on the Mississippi.”
My favourite Mark Twain quote:
“The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.” Mark Twain
LikeLiked by 8 people
Thank you, Rebecca! Sounds like a GREAT professor, with great insights about Shakespeare. Well remembered and described by you! And, yes, it’s impressive when writers are adept at both fiction and nonfiction — as Mark Twain was. I liked “Life on the Mississippi” a lot, and think his “The Innocents Abroad” is just about the best and funniest travel book I’ve ever read. Terrific Twain quote, too!
LikeLiked by 6 people
Here’s another Twain quote, and my favorite:
“The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter. ’Tis the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.”
LikeLiked by 4 people
Another outstanding Twain quote! He had many. I remember visiting the Twain museum in Hartford, Conn., and seeing some of those quotes etched in the wall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A great quote!!! Mark Twain said so much in one sentence. Thank you jhNY!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, of course.
Since you have mentioned Bunyan’s “The Pilgrim’s Progress” here lately, I thought of you as I began Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Celestial Railroad”. A few pages in, Hawthorne’s story appears to depend on a reader’s familiarity with Bunyan’s book, and presents a consideration of modern “improvements” made to principals and settings lately. Perhaps, if you haven’t already, you might be interested to read it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Many thanks for the recommendation, jhNY. I just found The Celestial Railroad and other writings of Nathanial Hawthorne on Gutenberg Press. I had never head of this short story before and am looking forward to seeing how Hawthorne adopts the style and content of John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hawthorne adopts mostly character and place names– the prose is a breezy sort of travelogue by a narrator we are meant to see as a sort of fool (among many) for a dubious ‘progress’– at least that’s my impression so far– I still have a few pages to go.
LikeLiked by 2 people
A personal note:
Last night on the phone I mentioned reading this bit of Hawthorne to my mother (still bright and engaged at 95!), and she revealed that Bunyan’s book was the first book she ever read– she grew up in what was then a very small and isolated place– the Eastern Shore of VA– and was probably the last in her line to have begun her reading life this way. I suspect her forebears — at least a few– may have learned to read out of the same work.
Had it not been for your recent mentions of PP, I doubt I would have read the Hawthorne story once I figured out its subject. Nor would I have learned how it was my my mother made first use of her ABC’s.
THANKS!
LikeLiked by 2 people
You just made my day, jhNY!! Thank you for sharing this amazing news with me. I am beyond thrilled that we have connected. My mother Frances, who is just about to turn 92 will enjoy hearing about how your mother made first use of her ABC’s. Frances was raised in Nebraska where the closest neighbour was a few mile down the road. Books were their life-line to the outside world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A lovely book-based set of connections indeed!
Dave has provided us with a welcoming place in which to make such things happen, and here we are– my favorite place on the internet.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you very much for the kind words, jhNY! 🙂
LikeLike
You are most welcome!
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
I agree wholeheartedly!!!! Thank you Dave!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much appreciated, Rebecca! Thank you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the slant of authors who wrote both fiction and non-fiction, and two additional ones come to mind: C. S. Lewis who was a professor of literature but more famous for his fiction books, and Isaac Asimov who was a professor of biochemistry but more famous for his fabulous scifi books.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Endless Weekend! Those are two terrific examples of writers who “diversified,” and were more known for one format over another. Asimov ended up writing or editing more than 500 fiction or nonfiction books during his lifetime! He even did a newspaper column starting in the 1980s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Was that in Newsweek? Did you ever read it? What did you think of it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The column was syndicated to various newspapers rather than appearing in any magazine, if I’m remembering correctly. It was a good column — with science-for-the-layperson elements — but it’s been more than three decades since I read it so I don’t recall details. I was a reporter at the press conference announcing the column, and got to meet Asimov and take a couple photos of him. 🙂
LikeLike
I remember reading Screwtape Letters when I was a teenager. What I most enjoyed way the format of using letters to create the narrative. I agree – Isaac Asimov was a genius in both genres.
LikeLiked by 2 people
His 3 laws of robotics stand … every test? I, too, am awed by him! I recently started re-reading his Foundation series, and while I thought I remembered it, it’s actually wonderfully new all over again!
LikeLiked by 2 people
CS Lewis was also known, mostly during his lifetime, as a writer on religious belief, very much derived out of his own in books such as “Mere Christianity”; his return to belief thanks in part to the influence of the writings of 19th century author George MacDonald.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Certainly his Narnia series reflects this: the religious themes are very much in evidence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t read any of Rowling’s crime fiction, using the pen name Robert Galbraith. Sounds like I’m missing out. >I’ve never watched the Super Bowl as I can’t handle the violence of the game.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Rosaliene! It IS a great crime fiction series — almost as compelling as “Harry Potter” in some ways. And I agree about the violence of football; countless athletes of course get hurt badly while playing, and many have health problems for the rest of their often-shortened lives. 😦
LikeLiked by 3 people
I wonder if she chose the pen name ‘Galbraith’ because the most famous of folk with that surname had the initials JK, John Kenneth Galbraith. “In all life one should comfort the afflicted but verily, also, one should afflict the comfortable, especially when they are comfortably, contentedly, even happily wrong”– JK Galbraith
LikeLiked by 1 person
Intriguing possibility, jhNY! John Kenneth Galbraith was certainly an admirable man in many ways. I met him once in the late 1980s — at an editorial cartoonist conference in Rhode Island, if memory serves.
LikeLike
He is a most quotable sort, that Galbraith. He was someone I would have liked to meet– glad you had the opportunity!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very quotable indeed! Someone who could connect to both “the elite” and “the average citizen.” I felt very privileged to have met him briefly.
LikeLike
I call it the “stupor bowl” too, Dave. Especially the fascination with the ads!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you, Audrey! Yes, the commercials are almost as stupefying as the game. The amount of money spent on those ads, and to buy time for those ads, is obscene — and most of the spots are dumb or annoying.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Better to read blog posts–or books!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes! My prediction for today: Blog posts read, 21; Super Bowls watched, 0. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
There was one ad that really set my teeth on edge: A Christianity promo titled ‘He Gets Us.’ I wrote the following on the topic:
I’d think, if Jesus really gets us, as the ad claims, we’d hear about it from Jesus, ‘gets us’ being in the present tense— not via a $20 million Superbowl ad.
For I was hungry, and you sold me loaded mac and cheese, for I was thirsty and you sold me a hi-energy sports drink, for I was a stranger and you rented me a single at Motel 6.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hmm…some religious entity had enough money for an ultra-pricey Super Bowl ad, but churches and such don’t get taxed. 😦
And that’s a funny/satirical third paragraph of yours. 🙂 As for “Jesus Gets Us,” many prefer People magazine over Us Weekly…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I found the IBH by far her best book – especially after the relentless depression of Troubled Blood. Although the tv adaptation did a good job of it.
See how they tackle this one!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Michael! Now I’m really looking forward to the rest of “The Ink Black Heart” (I’m about halfway through it). 🙂 I did also like “Troubled Blood” a lot, despite its mostly downbeat nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting to see how many novelists of that century began life as poets. The Brontes also did. But also interesting to see novelists who then turned to poetry. Excellent though provoking piece actually as to whether moving into the other genre was something they always intended, or a later conscious decision.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thank you, Shehanne! Yes, poetry was perhaps more of a “thing” — and perhaps more prestigious — than novels in the earlier part of the 19th century. And great question as to whether a major change in an author’s career was planned from the beginning or came up later. In the case of Herman Melville, his move to poetry for a number of years might have been desperation after several of his novels tanked with the public.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That is very possible Dave. Maybe some of them faced with the daunting task of the work involved and another tank in the library felt poetry was much less demanding to write, in terms of time, or lost their confidence over novels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That all makes sense, Shehanne.
In some ways, poetry feels easier to write than novels, but it’s certainly not easy. 🙂
LikeLike
The Brontes,including brother Branwell, also made fantastic prose fiction in their early years–
“As teenagers and young adults, Charlotte, Branwell, Emily and Anne Brontë all wrote stories set in imaginary worlds. Glass Town, their original fictional land, was invented by the four together, though Branwell and Charlotte Brontë were the dominant players. After 1831, Charlotte and Branwell branched out into Angria, an extension of Glass Town, while Emily and Anne invented their own private world of Gondal.”
https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/bront-juvenilia-the-history-of-angria
LikeLiked by 1 person
So much precocious talent in that family — including the ultimately mostly unfulfilled talent of Branwell.
LikeLike
I certainly admire authors who are able to successfully switch their modes of writing or begin a new series! One of those authors is Elly Griffiths (Domenica de Rosa). I’ve tried each of her adult mystery series and also a few of her non-mystery books under her real name, de Rosa. But my favorite books are the Ruth Galloway titles, and I eagerly await a new one most years. Unfortunately, I just read that the newest, the 15th, will be the last one in this series!!! I’m really sad about this and almost (not quite:) wish her other books weren’t quite so successful, evidently urging her to move on.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Thank you, Becky! Sounds like a great example of an author adept at switching modes of writing. Impressive! And it IS sad when a very-much-liked series ends, even as 15 books is a good run for an author — and reader.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Those 15 books whizzed by much too quickly, along with the years…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great books can indeed go by so quickly, Becky — which is a positive thing while also being very depressing. 🙂 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! I used to call the uh, event, by that same name. Enjoyed your post about J. K. Rowling, others.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Leah! Yes, the word “Stupor” is a good fit for that “uh, event.” (Funny turn of phrase. 🙂 ) I’d rather read a book than watch a quarterback “read” a defense. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people