Many well-known authors were almost exact contemporaries of other well-known authors. In some cases, that was just a meaningless coincidence. In other cases, they had some things in common.
I thought about this yesterday after FINALLY reading Johanna Spyri’s Heidi, which I greatly enjoyed. Then I tried to think of a blog topic that beloved 1881 book evoked, but I had seemingly written them all before. Novels starring children — check. Orphans in literature — check. (Mostly) upbeat fiction — check. Etc. So, out of desperation, I eventually came up with the similar-time-alive thing.
Spyri lived from 1827 to 1901, making her a somewhat-older contemporary of Mark Twain (1835-1910). Not much in common between a sort-of-famous writer (Spyri) and a VERY famous writer (the brilliant Twain). Heck, Heidi is a heartwarming novel — complete with its plucky protagonist and friendly goats (see above image) — while the often-funny/often-scathing Twain didn’t really “do” heartwarming. 🙂 But both authors created memorable young characters (of course Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer in Twain’s case), and Spyri’s home country of Switzerland was among the many places the U.S.-based Twain visited.
Having almost the same 19th-century birth and death years were George Eliot (1819-1880) and Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881). Both are among the very greatest novelists of all time, with their books’ many attributes including immense psychological insight. Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment and Eliot’s Daniel Deronda are among my five favorite novels.
Mary Shelley (1797-1851) and Honore de Balzac (1799-1850) were near-contemporaries, too, but they didn’t have much in common I can think of other than both being extraordinary writers. One English, one French; one best-known for speculative fiction, the other best-known for naturalist fiction…
Also few similarities between French author Alexandre Dumas (1802-1870) and American author Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804-1864). The former is best known for his rousing adventure novels (that were also literary in their way), while the latter often focused on moral issues and the like in a more subtle fashion. (If they had somehow collaborated, I suppose “The House of the Seven Musketeers” might have resulted. 🙂 )
On the other hand, there were these exact contemporaries with a lot in common in their writing: Virginia Woolf (1882-1941) and James Joyce (also 1882-1941). Both are known for their modernist, nonlinear fiction — and they undoubtedly had some influence on each other’s work.
William Shakespeare (1564-1616) and Don Quixote author Miguel de Cervantes (1547-1616) died within days of each other, but Cervantes was obviously quite a bit older. Both are among literature’s most-iconic writers in different genres.
Gabriel Garcia Marquez (1927-2014) and Toni Morrison (1931-2019) both wrote multi-layered novels featuring memorable relationships and strong social-justice elements — relating to race, ethnicity, gender, class, etc. Also, both didn’t see their first novels published until they were around 40, with Marquez working as a journalist and Morrison as a book editor before that.
Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961) and John Steinbeck (1902-1968) were both 27 when their first novels appeared, and each mostly spotlighted male characters in their fiction — though Hemingway had a more macho/misogynist attitude. Together, they were married seven times (Hemingway four, Steinbeck three). Also, both did war reporting during their lives.
Science-fiction connections? Arthur C. Clarke (1917-2008) and Ray Bradbury (1920-2012) were approximate contemporaries. Frank Herbert (Dune) and Isaac Asimov were also born in 1920, but didn’t live nearly as long as Bradbury — Herbert until 1985 and Asimov until 1992.
Then there’s this trio born within a year of each other: Colette (1873-1954), Willa Cather (1873-1947), and L.M. Montgomery (1874-1942). The first two are known for adult fiction, the third mostly for young-adult fiction — though Montgomery also wrote excellent “grown-up” novels such as The Blue Castle. Montgomery and Colette could be very funny in their books; Cather much less so. Cather and Montgomery both wrote powerful World War I novels (One of Ours and Rilla of Ingleside) — illustrating that the time period when authors are alive can lead to similarly themed content. Cather was gay (something only obliquely referenced in her fiction) while Colette was bisexual (more directly referenced in some of her novels).
Any other authors you’d like to mention who were roughly contemporaries?
My literary-trivia book is described and can be purchased here: Fascinating Facts About Famous Fiction Authors and the Greatest Novels of All Time.
In addition to this weekly blog, I write the 2003-started, award-winning “Montclairvoyant” topical-humor column for Baristanet.com. The latest piece — about a controversial school principal incident and a supermarket that may or may not come to town — is here.
Edgar Allan Poe and Nikolai Gogol were both born in 1809 and they both had similar short lifespans. Both authors also wrote about the grotesque and the fantastic in their fiction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Tony! Great mention of that pair/birth-year pairing. Gogol’s “Dead Souls” certainly has a bit of a Poe aspect.
Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin were also born in 1809 — quite a year for famous births!
LikeLike
A tangent concerning coincidental events:
1492 was also the year King Boabdil surrendered Granada to the Spanish crown– Granada was the last Moslem territory left in Spain till then.
1776 was also the year Adam Smith published “The Wealth of Nations”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Two major years!
I’ve visited Granada. An amazing city to see.
I’m thinking Adam Smith is not related to Patti Smith or Will Smith… 🙂
LikeLike
No, but there was an ‘Adam Smith’ (George Gerome Waldo Goodman, 1930-2014) who wrote under that pseudonym on matters of finance a few decades ago. It was he who thought that the most useful book on how to understand the market was “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds”, by Charles Mackay, published in 1841. I own a copy. Fascinating stuff– covers witch hunting, land bubbles, the tulip mania, and more wacky foibles of humankind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like quite a book, that 1841 one!
One tulip-mania novel I enjoyed was Alexandre Dumas’ “The Black Tulip.”
LikeLike
See also Semper Augustus, for which, at the height of the mania, a an owner of a bulb was offered 12 acres of land.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow!
LikeLike
Would not post my comment, second time says sorry duplicate coomment can not be posted..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha third try Dave, I tricked them.
Can`t go that far but far enough this is in 1030`s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, bebe! Didn’t know that the two of them had met! Amazing meeting of amazing minds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Second try Dave, below…they were refusing to post mine yet again….
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Rabindranath Tagore and Albert Einstein met each other several times. Two of their meetings, one in July and the other in August of 1930 in Germany, provide us with scholastic dialogues between them that are very relevant to newer phenomenological discourses.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Impressive!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Flaubert and Turgenev were contemporaries and correspondents. Robert Louis Stevenson and Henry James spent a summer together in a convalescent setting– a small village in England. Stevenson was there for his health, James was there for his ailing sister’s. The Turgenev-Flaubert connection did not surprise me when I read of it, but the Stevenson- James friendship– which was mutual, as was their high regard for each other, I did not anticipate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, jhNY — did not know that about Robert Louis Stevenson and Henry James! Such different writers — though Stevenson’s last (unfinished) novel “Weir of Hermiston” has a bit of a Jamesian feel to it.
LikeLike
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/n10/andrew-o-hagan/bournemouth
LikeLiked by 1 person
SO interesting, jhNY! Thank you for the link!
LikeLike
Two of the most influential and beloved writers of British novels not only lived at roughly the same time, but in the same house: Emily and Charlotte Bronte!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, yes, sibling authors might share quite a few years and living spaces. We can add two-time novelist Anne Bronte in there, too. 🙂
LikeLike
The question of whether Dickens and Dostoevsky met, wrote or knew each others’ works has always fascinated me! I look forward to your upcoming themes, Dave. They are always so thought provoking, and must arise from your own natural curiosity. So relatable. BTW my copy of The Alice Network is on its turtle paced way from my local library 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the kind words, Mary Jo! I think most avid readers have a strong curiosity. 🙂 Writers, too!
That IS a fascinating question abut Dickens and Dostoevsky — two colossuses of 19th-century literature. Their respective work feels quite different, but they of course had in common both being very ambitious with their novels — especially their mid- and late-career books.
I know Dickens and Mark Twain had a connection — Twain was in the audience when Dickens spoke in the U.S. during an 1867-68 tour. Not sure they actually met, though.
Ha — your description of the frustratingly slow arrival of “The Alice Network.” A terrific novel worth waiting for!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well Dave!!!!
You just gave me a bunch of whole new authors. Your research is quite deep. Can you also write about the classical horror and mystery writers. There are pretty famous horror classics like Dracula and Frankenstein. Similarly in the mystery genre, there are great tycoons such as Sherlock who dominate this genre. But there are are many who have written quite formidable stories but are not that famous.
Also, the fourth part of my series THE GHOST OF ROOM 424 is out now. And it is much more horror than the last parts and unveils many mysteries and my theories about paranormal. Please check it out too.
THANK YOU!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, pranav dev! I appreciate the kind words!
I’ve written in the past about some of what you suggested in posts such as these:
https://daveastoronliterature.com/2018/10/14/crime-all-the-time-or-some-of-the-time/
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fiction-with-a-fear-facto_b_1939361
Congratulations on the fourth part of your “The Ghost of Room 424” series being out!
LikeLike
MR James, Sheridan LeFanu, Algernon Blackwood, EF Benton, Shirley Jackson, Lafcadio Hearn, Ambrose Bierce.
Not everything they wrote were ghost stories, but each author listed has written some good ones.
Enjoy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Heidi!!! I loved that book when I was a kid 🙂 🙂 As I’ve been searching for more upbeat reads lately, you’ve reminded me that’s a good one for me to find a copy of and re-read. I also appreciate the Hemingway/Steinbeck mention. I enjoy Hemingway a lot, and Steinbeck ranks quite high on my favorite authors of all time list. As for contemporaries, I might throw a couple modern authors in there, and these two ladies have rapidly worked their way up on my favorites list as well. Kate Quinn (as I’m sure you well know by now!) and Ruta Sepetys. Both write female-centered stories around the world wars, although Sepetys tackled the Spanish Civil War with her most recent work. Both have really mastered the art of historical-fiction storytelling, bringing the events back to life in a very real way. And both keep me turning the page, although I might have to say that Kate Quinn is a bit better with action writing, where Sepetys really excels in the character/human thought process of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, M.B.! “Heidi” is definitely upbeat, except for the middle portion of the novel in Frankfurt. I agree that it’s nice to read or reread something like that in this miserable year of 2020!
I LOVED the two Kate Quinn novels you recommended: “The Alice Network” and “The Huntress.” If Ruta Sepetys is in Quinn’s class as a writer, she must be excellent indeed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How about Charles Bukowski and Raymond Carver? Bukowski was older than Carver, but they did write at the same time. They both wrote about ordinary people and alcoholism but with different effects. Carver’s work leaves me feeling empty and sad, while I need to take a shower after reading Bukowski.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Liz! That’s an excellent pairing/comparison! Carver’s memorable stories are indeed downbeat, and I know what you mean about Bukowski. Kind of a revolting human being, but quite a writer. I read his based-on-fact novel “Hollywood” a few years ago, and found it hilarious and gross at the same time. And SO much drinking depicted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Dave! I’m glad I could inject some gritty [read “revolting”] realism into the conversation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! Yes, “gritty” is the word for Bukowski.
I think my favorite thought about Bukowski is that U2 referenced his poetry in its song “Dirty Days.”
LikeLike
Fascinating information as always, Dave! I have absolutely no memory of reading Heidi OR Pollyanna OR Pippi Longstocking, so I must not have. However, your writing always sends me on Google searches to find out more about the authors you mention.
Reading about Fitzgerald and Zelda always makes me so sad! I had forgotten how talented Zelda was in her own right. She wrote as well as painted! I had also forgotten they had a daughter. She said about her parents: “I have never been able to buy the notion that it was my father’s drinking which led her to the sanitarium. Nor do I think she led him to the drinking.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dave, please fix “in her on right” to “in her own right”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fixed!
LikeLike
Thank you, lulabelle! I know what you mean about Google searches. I often enjoy doing them after seeing comments here. 🙂
Yes, Zelda Fitzgerald was quite talented in her own right. She and F. Scott Fitzgerald definitely had troubled lives. 😦 Their daughter at least had a somewhat-less-troubled life, and a somewhat longer one — she lived until 1986.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I read a biography of Zelda Fitzgerald years ago. What stayed with me about it was how desperately Zelda tried to become an artist (trying multiple modes of creative expression), but it eluded her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So sad when that happens (or doesn’t happen), Liz. Of course, her being a woman during a time even more patriarchal than today didn’t help. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it was heart-wrenching to read because she wanted it so badly, and people viewed her as a dilattante and an embarassment to her husband.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not right and not fair. So much wasted potential in that couple, though F. Scott of course was able to fill some of his. “Tender Is the Night,” his last completed novel, seems very autobiographical. Mostly excellent book, but often painful to follow the lives of the characters based on him and Zelda.
LikeLike
Zelda Fitzgerald did make an over-late though dedicated try at ballet, and could not come up to professional grade, but years ago, I saw one of her few extant paintings, done while she was under care. It was a still life of flowers and I thought it was very good, its colors skillfully rendered, the composition too. I have never run across anything she wrote.
Good thing, I guess, F. Scott had no attic, or he might have done a Rochester. Not his finest hour. Not even close.
Some of his correspondence with Scottie made it into “The Crack-Up”. I remember getting a good laugh out of his grousing over bills she had run up at ‘Peck & Peck & Peck &Peck’, and from his observation, after a lifetime in letters, that all the English one really need to know was : ‘Yeah’, ‘Naw’ and ‘Gimme the Meat.’
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, jhNY! Trying ballet at an “advanced” age, and showing painting skill — that shows guts (desperation?), and some talent.
Yes, F. Scott seemed to be a mixed bag as a person — including having a compassion deficit. Could have been his nature, the early fame, etc. It IS hard dealing with people with mental illness (my family/extended family has some experience with that), but…
Funny last paragraph!
LikeLike
Ah Heidi… I loved that book as a kid. I will tell you what I loved about that book and also the Twain books cos you have mentioned these authors as contemporaries. They took you to another world. Very diff worlds. As you say, Twain was funnier and more scathing and Auntie was far more ready with the wallop than Grandad. Little Women at that time also came into that category of a diff family life for me. Okay, so writers who were contemporaries (and prob did influence each other)… for me would include the many members of the hard boiled school, I’m awfully fond of the hard boiled school, Hammett, McCoy, Burnett, Cain, Chandler, but in a very different classroom here there’s Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Steinbeck (when he wrote ‘shorts’ ). They were all born roughly about the same time and some died about the same time too. Many of them worked in Hollywood. Not just cos their books were ideal screen fodder of the 30s-50s, but on other scripts. I gather a broke Fitzgerald worked disastrously on GWTW a book he was less than flattering about. A fascinating post Dave. And glad you finally read Heidi.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Shehanne!
Terrific/relevant mention of the “hard-boiled” school of authors. Definitely near-contempories who undoubtedly had some influence on each other’s writing and made some similar career choices (Hollywood, etc.). I had no idea F. Scott Fitzgerald worked on the “Gone With the Wind” movie, however disastrously. He was clearly in bad straits economically, and alcoholically, in the latter 1930s — though “The Last Tycoon” was shaping up to be an excellent novel when left unfinished at his death.
Yes, both “Heidi” and Mark Twain’s work and any great novel can take a reader to another world — which reminds me of Twain being a character on a memorable episode of “Star Trek: The Next Generation.” 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh my, I never saw that episode. We always like the old Star Trek. It was wonderfully cardboardy sets and all. Yeah Fitzgerald was in a bad way at that time, broke and ill. He thought screenwriting was a way of getting a steady income. A lot of his contemporaries were already there churning them out. Again, not just cos they had their own books on the screen. And he did work on full scripts but that one ??? I think that was short and sweet. Mind you that one used up a ton of writers and directors. And it was a pity re the Last Tycoon.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, the earlier “Star Trek” shows were of their lower-production-values time — until the later TV series and the later movies got increasingly sophisticated-looking.
It’s amazing how some films that use multiple directors and multiple writers can sometimes turn out really well — also the case with “The Wizard of Oz.” Usually, the ability/vision of one director and one writer works best.
F. Scott Fitzgerald definitely did a number on his life — so short. But he of course churned out many memorable stories and a few great novels in those 44 years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He did indeed. His short stories are also excellent. You are right re some movies. The old studio factory system seemed to mean a lot of replacements–obviously they could always get someone else in. A lot of rows too. Yeah we were big fans of the unsophisticated Star Trek.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I read a collection of Fitzgerald’s short stories for the first time a year or two ago, and was very impressed. Might have been his best medium, even more so than novels (with the exception of the perfect “The Great Gatsby” and the uneven “Tender Is the Night”).
Yes, the old Hollywood studio system allowed for more interchangeable parts.
I loved the original “Star Trek,” “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” “Star Trek: Deep Space Nine,” and “Star Trek: Voyager” before no longer watching new “Star Trek” TV iterations when I stopped watching TV. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t blame you for the latter there. Yes Fitzgerald’s short stories are wonderful. It seems he made quite decent money from them and you can see why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, some magazines paid contributing writers quite well back then. Certainly better than most do today, when inflation is factored in. 😦
No longer watching TV definitely freed up more time for reading. I still watch plenty of YouTube clips, though. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
We mainly stick to Netflix. Too many reality shows and soaps on tv here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Netflix gives a person about everything one needs! My younger daughter is a big user. 🙂
I’m not a fan of reality shows or soaps, either.
LikeLike
Yeah netflix does. Reality shows are just cheap TV.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheap TV indeed! A lot of that kind of television out there, which is one reason I stopped watching. Some quality stuff, too, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely. And there’s been some very good drama we’ve watched. But often these things are thin on the ground.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you’re fond of hard-boiled fiction, perhaps you have already run across Carroll John Daly, the most popular of all who contributed to “The Black Mask” magazine ( a magazine founded by HL Mencken and others from “The Smart Set”, who saw the detective magazine as a way to fund their more consciously literary efforts). One of his stories, ‘Three Gun Terry’ was reprinted in “The Black Mask Boys”, and there is a Nash novella included in “The Big Book of Pulps”. It is my firm opinion that Nash had no small influence on most who followed him.
Also, for a thinly-veiled account of an even more disastrous foray of Fitzgerald in the movie game, see Budd Schulberg’s The Disenchanted.” Young Budd and spent Scott took a train across the country to witness the winter carnival at Dartmouth so as to prepare to write a screenplay, and Scott fell spectacularly off the wagon en route. The names in the novel were changed, but much of the story, especially the train trip, are probably a recounting, and not so much fiction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Novels describing real life with a thin veil of fiction can be rather interesting…
LikeLike
I loved Heidi as a child, Dave, and it continues to remind me that hope and kindness build resilience. What came to mind was another book that I enjoyed as a child, Pollyanna, by Eleanor H. Porter which was written in 1913, also considered a children’s classic:Pollyanna. Pollyanna was an orphan who came to live with her strict aunt. She cheered the entire village (the Glad Game) and then had a tragic accident where she loses the use of her legs. Here’s a quote from Pollyanna, which will give you the thought behind the plot. “What men and women need is encouragement. Their natural resisting powers should be strengthened, not weakened…. Instead of always harping on a man’s faults, tell him of his virtues.” Heidi and Pollyanna are in sharp contrast to Pippi Longstocking by Astrid Lindgren, who is unconventional and superhumanly strong – able to lift her horse one-handed. As a child I felt a sense of personal strength when I read these books. For all three characters have a strong belief is living boldly and disrupting the status quo. Thank you for a wonderful journey through all the amazing writers that have given us many hours of enjoyment and reflection.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thank you, Clanmother! Interesting mentions of the Pollyanna and Pippi Longstocking characters!
There definitely seem to be some similarities between the “Heidi” and “Pollyanna” books — orphan characters, disability (also including the girl Klara in “Heidi”), some strict adults, and of course kindness, resiliency, and “pluckiness.”
I can see how young readers would be fascinated with, entertained by, and inspired by Heidi, Pollyanna, and the somewhat different Pippi.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I often wonder if a new generation will see these stories in a different way. I am currently reading Auntie Mame by Patrick Denis, which went out of favour and now is making a comeback. Very interesting to read because Patric Denis spoke of the issues that we still are seeing today. Always a great conversation on your blog. Thank you Dave.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So true, Clanmother, that novels can be seen in a different way/reinterpreted during different eras. Another example would be Sinclair Lewis’ 1935 novel “It Can’t Happen Here,” which almost reads like a prescient blueprint for the Trump presidency.
And thank you for the kind words!
LikeLiked by 2 people
My father really enjoyed Sinclair Lewis!!! Books are a call to action.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lewis was a great author — and what an amazing run of 1920s novels: “Main Street,” “Babbitt,” “Arrowsmith,” “Elmer Gantry,” and “Dodsworth.” I found them all compelling.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have just downloaded Main Street! My father talked about Sinclair Lewis, but I have never read him. This fall, I will be heading virtually to Minnesota to meet up with a brave woman, Carol Kennicott. Why am I not surprised Carol was a librarian?!!! Thank you for the introduction, Dave.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nice, Clanmother! Great novel! Carol Kennicott had to deal with a lot of frustration; she wasn’t cut out for smaller-town life. 😦
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pippi Longstocking was my absolute favorite when I was a kid. I wanted to BE Pippi Longstocking!
LikeLiked by 2 people
So wonderful when literature gives a child that feeling!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wanted to be one of the Boxcar Children, too, but not an orphan. I’d live in the boxcar in the yard, and my parents could live in the house. A perfect bookish fantasy of having one’s cake and eating it, too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Love that! Even better than living in a tent in one’s backyard!
LikeLike
Thanks to Laurel Cummins (my wife), Maria (my younger daughter), jhNY, and Kat Lit for mentioning/recommending “Heidi”!
LikeLiked by 3 people